亚马逊否认接受比特币但仍招聘加密货币人才

该招聘公告指出:“你将运用区块链、分布式账本、央行数字货币和加密货币领域的专业知识,为应开发的功能开发用例,并将与包括AWS在内的整个亚马逊团队密切合作,制定包括客户体验、技术支持以及推广战略等的产品路线图。”

亚马逊是一家规模庞大的巨头,可以在不同领域开展广泛试验,这意味着招聘广告中提到的项目不总是会成为新的业务线。

但这则消息引发了人们对亚马逊在数字货币领域作为的各种猜测。因此,有媒体援引报道指出,亚马逊计划在今年年底前接受比特币支付,并在2022年推出属于自家的加密货币。

然而,亚马逊否认了这一传闻。

亚马逊发言人在一封电子邮件中说:“尽管我们对加密货币领域很感兴趣,但围绕我们的加密货币具体计划所产生的猜测是不真实的。”

不过,该公司早些时候确实表明了对加密货币的兴趣,并称加密货币是一种受到年轻人和精通技术的消费者欢迎的数字代币。

该公司在一份声明中表示:“加密货币领域的创新激发了我们的灵感。我们正在探索加密货币被亚马逊所使用的前景。我们相信,未来将建立在新兴科技之上,使现代化、快速且廉价的支付成为可能,并希望尽快将这种未来带给亚马逊的客户。”

据悉,曾在几年前的一次活动中,亚马逊首席执行官Andy Jassy表示,公司正密切关注区块链的发展,但对这项技术持怀疑态度。

Jassy在2017年的一次新闻发布会上表示:“我们还没有看到分布式账本技术在区块链实际用例中广泛应用。我们不会因为技术很酷而构建技术,只有当我们认为能够解决客户问题时,我们才会构建技术,而构建服务是解决问题的最佳方式。”

目前,亚马逊并不允许用户使用任何加密货币进行支付,而该公司AWS部门销售的是区块链技术基础设施产品。

但如今已有多家企业表示进军加密货币领域。在今年4月,PayPal(PYPL.US)宣布,开始允许其Venmo应用程序的部分客户购买、出售和持有数字货币。该公司表示,在PayPal应用程序中加入加密货币交易后,使用该功能的用户登录频率是改变前的两倍。

由亿万富翁马斯克领导的特斯拉(TSLA.US)则对加密货币的态度摇摆不定。早些时候,该公司表示接受比特币支付,但在5月份暂停该项服务,理由是担心加密货币挖矿中使用化石燃料将影响环境。但在本月,马斯克表示,随着比特币挖矿转向更多可再生能源,这家电动汽车制造商可能会恢复加密货币支付。

By 智通财经

特斯拉可能恢复接受比特币作为支付

在加密货币立场上反复横跳的马斯克,又一次公开力挺比特币,并表示未来特斯拉可能恢复接受比特币作为支付手段的计划。

特斯拉首席执行官埃隆·马斯克当地时间周三在出席线上活动时表示,他和他旗下的SpaceX都持有比特币,但并没有透露具体的持有情况。他还表示,他个人拥有以太坊和狗狗币。

马斯克还表示,随着比特币挖矿使用可再生能源的比例增加,特斯拉之后可能恢复接受比特币作为支付手段:

我想再做一些尽职调查,以确认可再生能源的使用比例可能达到或超过50%,并且有趋势让这一数字进一步增加。倘若确实如此,那特斯拉最终将恢复接受比特币(作为购车的支付手段)。马斯克在谈到比特币挖矿使用的能源时表示,并不期望它会像雪那么干净,但它使用的不能是世界上最肮脏的煤炭。他随后还补充称,水电、地热和核能都可以是用于比特币挖矿的良好能源。

马斯克声称,自己一直长期持有比特币,且不会卖出,他希望比特币获得成功:

倘若比特币的价格下跌,那我就会赔钱。我可能会做多比特币,但我不会去做空。我绝对不会相信价格拉高之后卖出或者类似这样的东西,我希望看到比特币成功。

消息传出之后,上述三种加密货币的价格均出现拉升,其中以太坊更曾短暂突破2000美元的整数关口,不过至截稿时出现回落。

今年2月,特斯拉披露了对比特币的15亿美元投资,不久之后就宣布开始接受比特币作为其车辆的支付方式。然而,随着马斯克对比特币挖矿所使用的电力来源表示担忧,该公司很快改变了方向,于5月暂停了这项计划。特斯拉今年4月表示,它已出售了部分比特币,截至第一季度末,其持有的比特币价值约为13亿美元。

与马斯克同时出席活动的还有推特公司的CEO Jack Dorsey,以及ARK Invest的“木头姐”Cathie Wood。马斯克在活动当中还询问Jack Dorsey,推特是否会允许广告商用加密货币支付费用,Dorsey称会加以考虑。

在这次线上活动之前的数日,马斯克还曾对狗狗币大肆唱多。当时他在推特上表示,自己的“小儿子Lil X一直像冠军一样抱着狗狗币,从来没说过一次‘卖’这个词”。而一位推特博主在询问马斯克和Lil X未来在哪里可以看到狗狗币时,Lil X把手指向了月亮。

对于比特币的未来走势,市场人士也发表了自己的看法。在接受彭博访谈时,Ava Trade Ltd.的首席市场分析师纳伊姆·阿斯拉姆(Naeem Aslam)指出,市场担心比特币一旦跌破30000美元大关,随后将出现剧烈下行,但实际情况并未如此。币价一直很稳定,也没有出现任何的恐慌性抛售。但他同时也指出,比特币仍可能在未来几周测试25000美元的支撑水平。彭博同时还援引了丹麦盛宝银行的首席投资官Steen Jakobsen的分析:在比特币跌穿30000美元的关键区域后,比特币和以太坊曾经尝试了一次反弹,但要是想彻底“从坑里出来”的话,则需要站稳在32000美元以上。

比特币,以太坊和狗狗币在最近24小时均出现了明显升势,其中以太坊曾短暂突破2000美元的整数关口,而狗狗币曾短暂站在0.2美元上方,更曾挑战0.21美元附近,但至截稿时均出现了回落。根据CoinDesk的行情数据,截至发稿,比特币报31554.54美元,24小时涨5.44%;以太坊报1934.16美元,24小时涨7.57%;狗狗币报0.1868美元,24小时涨7.11%。

不过,如果从今年内的高位起算,上述三种加密货币的跌幅仍然超过50%,其中狗狗币的跌幅更是将近75%。

By 高星

What is BarnBridge

BarnBridge is an idea & whitepaper originally conceived in Q2 2019. At the time, MakerDAO was starting to garner mainstream awareness and capture the imagination of what is now known as the DeFi, or decentralized finance, community. Over a year later, with 60% of Global debt yielding less than 1% & over $15 trillion of global debt yielding negative rates, capital continues moving into higher risk yield streams.

Meanwhile, there is a decentralized financial system, referred to as Defi in this paper, burgeoning in the digital economy with digital assets and cryptocurrencies. While debt levels, which is referred to as TVL, or total value locked in decentralized financial protocols, has increased from hundreds of millions last year, to billions of dollars in 2020, yield on these instruments continues to dwarf the menial rates offered by comparable products in the legacy TradFi system. Conversely, due to assumed higher risk levels coupled with higher efficiencies provided by smart contract technologies, annual percentage yield (APY) is far higher on decentralized protocols than what can be found in the traditional financial system. Working capital is following the historical trend of following higher yield which is why we are seeing TVL moving to Defi at an accelerating rate. This is a trend that will continue.

The need for familiar TradFi instruments to exist throughout the DeFi ecosystem has never been stronger. BarnBridge is an idea whose time has come.

DeFi Primer: Risk Ramps and TradFi Bridges

The yield products in the decentralized markets which are yielding higher APY than yield products in traditional markets are currently crypto backed loans. Instead of selling crypto for fiat, borrowers are staking digital assets and receiving digital assets in return. While these loans have mostly been short term loans to traders, the system has proven to be efficient & ripe for expansion. These efficiencies will inevitably attract higher value, longer duration loans to decentralized ledgers. The efficiencies referenced are enabled by smart contracts’ ability to hold digital collateral until both sides of the transaction fulfill their obligations algorithmically. The reduction of custody, settlement, and escrow — labor-intensive, costly actions within the legacy system — to algorithmic actions is reducing the rent charged by the labor to perform these actions. These efficiencies, coupled with the perception of higher risk, are why the yields are higher on decentralized systems. As risk in DeFi converges on risk levels perceived in TradFi, by the nature of the loans moving from crypto backed loans to traders to collateralized mortgage loans to homeowners, for instance, the efficiency of smart contracts will continue to offer higher yield on decentralized systems than traditional centralized systems.

What’s more, the efficiency of smart contracts and DAO technologies allows for far more complex derivative instruments to be built & provides a level of transparency and security unfathomable to current financial networks.

All of these efficiencies are currently stemmed and built off of crypto backed loans.

As previously discussed, these efficiencies should extrapolate to mortgage debt and corporate debt moving to decentralized platforms on a longer timeline. This should also encourage more complex derivatives based on debt and yield to move to decentralized platforms. We will be able to structure far more complex derivatives and track them with far greater efficiency and transparency than possible before the innovations of blockchain, cryptocurrency, smart contracts, and decentralized autonomous organization technology were realized. $244 trillion in debt and yield based derivatives will continue to move to more efficient technologies over time. The migration of yield and yield-based derivatives from less efficient centralized financial systems to more efficient decentralized financial systems will be one of the largest movements of wealth in human history. BarnBridge exists to help facilitate this transition and make the decentralized financial system much more efficient, risk-flexible, and attractive to a wider range of participants.

There is a massive market for people wanting to get into crypto who (1) don’t want to bite off the entire risk curve of owning, lending, or receiving an entire digital asset & (2) will never take the time to use a decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) to create a smart contract which algorithmically scripts both sides of the loan or agreement. Over 99.9% of global debt is still structured via traditional markets and is starving for yield. Conversely, more advanced financial companies have different risk tolerances. This allows for different structures at each point of the yield curve with the riskiest (likely hedge funds) wanting to put the least money down with the highest return for their bet/hedge. On the contrary, more conservative investors are often willing to give up a large portion of upside opportunity in order to access safer instruments. “Riskless” products, as tradFi describes them, are not currently offered in the decentralized financial ecosystem. The opportunity to structure these types of instruments will allow for more risk averse investors in the traditional markets to move into the decentralized markets.

In the shorter term phase (DeFi) & medium term phase (Proof of Stake) risk ramps will continue to create markets and industries for traditional investment firms who want to “get off zero” or “get above 1%.” As this happens, more and more types of loans will move to decentralized ledgers. In the long run, and partially through this process, lenders and borrowers will understand why decentralized and trustless intermediaries are superior and less costly than the current 3rd party intermediaries. As this happens, larger portions of the $244 trillion in global debt will move to the chain, creating the opportunity for more yield, more risk ramps, and higher CD-like (collateralized debt) products for fiat and crypto depositors of the new age commercial banks & financial markets.

1. Fluctuation Derivatives Protocol

BarnBridge is the first fluctuation derivative protocol. Before the advent of smart contract technology it was close to impossible to track & attribute yield to a divided allotment of capital, trustlessly & transparently, to provide hedges against any and all fluctuations. Conceptually, you can build derivative products from any type of market driven fluctuation to hedge various risks. Examples include, but are not limited to, interest rate sensitivity, fluctuations in underlying market price, fluctuations in predictive market odds, fluctuations in default rates across mortgages, fluctuations in commodity prices, and a seemingly infinite number of market based fluctuations to hedge a particular position.

We plan to create the first cross platform derivatives protocol for any and all fluctuations. To start, we will focus on yield sensitivity & market price. Downstream, we plan to introduce a far wider variety of hedges against fluctuations in the decentralized ecosystem. BarnBridge aims to be platform and asset agnostic.

You can reduce the risk of digital assets & digital asset yield sensitivity by breaking them into essentially infinite, separate, dollar-denominated chunks, or tranches, and building derivatives off these tranches. BarnBridge aims to smooth out the risk curve and offer layered risk management to both DeFi & tradFi investors by building more efficient debt & yield based derivatives.

2. Initial Product Offerings

Smart $BONDS — Structured Market Adjusted Risk Tranches

2.1 Smart Yield Bonds

Interest rate volatility risk mitigation using debt based derivatives.

Currently, the decentralized financial system is primarily offering variable rate annuities. However, the ability to structure yield into fixed rates will come in the form of locked collateral with a maturity on repayments, or bonds, as well as fixed rate yields with no maturity, or annuities. We don’t believe this to be a novel idea & we believe naturally that these types of products will come to DeFi over time. However, the types of derivatives & complexity reduction in financial planning you’ll be able to structure and implement with the existence of fixed yield in smart contracts will be mind blowing to traditional financial markets.

Decentralized financial instruments are showcasing the power that a trustless financial industry can wield. Powerhouse projects in the DeFi space like MakerDAO, Synthetix, AAVE, Compound, Curve, and others are producing yields for users that have none of the constraints and rent seeking of tradFi instruments by replacing bookkeepers, escrow and various overhead with algorithms, trustless oracles, and decentralized ledgers. Different market driven yields can be found on numerous decentralized platforms, but there is nothing out there that services & pulls together all of the different decentralized protocols & allows for a normalized risk curve and derivatives for risk mitigation.

Furthermore, efficiencies across lending protocols are non-existent in the current DeFi markets. The ability to pull yield from numerous protocols and tranche them into higher and lower yield buckets is something that exists in traditional financial markets but is more efficient in decentralized financial markets, assuming an acceptable level of liquidity.

Flattening the risk curve across DeFi.
Bundling and Rating.

Our first structuring will not only allow deFi users to get access to fixed yield but also pools yield from numerous protocols across the ecosystem creating a more efficient market, again, smoothing out the yield curve across the entire industry.

While we expect singular lending protocols to introduce concepts around fixed income on their platform, a major differentiation of a cross protocol based approach to fixed income is the diversified assets & diversified platform risk. By algorithmically pooling interest generating digital assets on a number of lending platforms, we will create greater efficiencies by spreading risk & normalizing the industry risk curve. Since BarnBridge does not lend money directly off a native platform, & instead pools lending across the industry, it allows us to be platform agnostic & digital asset agnostic which in turn will allow for more complex structuring and bond rating systems downstream.

Risk and Loss Scenarios.
Scenario 1
Scenario 2

Pooled collateral would be deposited into lending protocols or yield generating contracts, and the yield will be bundled up into different tranches and tokenized. So you could buy exposure to the most senior tranche and get a lower yield but have a much lower risk profile. SMART bonds are a way to buy and sell risk on yield with all of the pricing driven purely by the market.

Reference financial structuring can be found here.

2.2 Smart Alpha Bonds

Market Price Exposure Risk Mitigation using tranched volatility derivatives.

The SMART Alpha bonds will not be structured via traditional yield tranches but instead with various levels of market price exposure, which we will call risk ramps. The idea is that every bucket or tranche of price exposure does not need to be flat across the entire risk curve, meaning the first $100 of price exposure does not need to deserve the same upside and downside volatility. This is similar to having fractional ownership but with different risk/reward for the fractions.

For example, if the current price of 1 ETH is expected to be $1000, and moves to $900, the first tranche (the riskiest tranches) takes a higher percentage of the loss. Conversely, if the current price of 1 ETH is expected to be $1000, and moves to $1100, the first tranche (the riskiest tranches) takes a higher percentage of the gain.

How these gains and losses are measured & allocated across tranches can be done algorithmically with smart contracts. Each tranche can be traded as a unique digital asset. For example jETH (a junior tranche of ETH price exposure), mETH (a mezzanine tranche of ETH price exposure, and sbETH (a senior tranche of ETH price exposure). The tranches will exist as risk ramps in which users of various risk appetites can gain price exposure to digital assets.

The SMART Alpha product will make way to build tranches of single asset and multi-asset pools that generate yield and where lower risk ramps get lower returns when the underlying assets rise & lower losses when they drop. However, we can build this without needing yield attached at all. The opportunity for downstream opportunities to use various risk ramps for differing collateral obligations is a logical progression these risk ramps will create.

3. Token — $BOND

BOND is an ERC-20 token. It will be used to stake in the system, and as a governance token when the governance module is launched. As it conforms to the ERC-20 standard, the $BOND token is tradeable on any exchange and storable on any wallet — allowing anyone in the world to access it.

By Tyler Scott Ward

Published
Categorized as Hot Crypto

What is TELLOR

Tellor is a relatively new small-cap altcoin in decentralized finance (Defi). Defi is coming up incredibly fast. More and more crypto and blockchain projects are starting to deal in Defi. We are happy to explain what Tellor is, how it works, difference between Chainlink and Tellor and why Tellor is used.

Tellor Team

The experienced team is one of the essential points of success. A professional team behind a project is one of the most critical fundamental criteria for the sustainability of a project. The tellor team consists of 3 prominent members:

  • Brenda Loya (CEO)
  • Michael Zemrose (co-founder)
  • Nicholas Fett (CTO))

The CEO and CTO have experience and are Ethereum developers. They also founded DAXIA. This is a company that created Ethereum derivatives and smart contracts. They’re also both economists. The CEO has worked for the US government, and the CTO has worked for the CFTC. The co-founder has also worked at DAXIA.

They are three different profiles, but very experienced in their field and know each other well as they have founded a company about Ethereum before. So they know how to work together as a team.

The rewards for the tellor’s team

Also known as “Dev revenue share” it means that 10% of the total revenue generated by miners goes to the Tellor team’s wallet. That may sound weird and unfair, but it’s not. This project did not had any ICO or raised money in any other way. The team set up the project with their funds. That is why this is their way of continuing to finance the project.

This is, of course, the most challenging model to start with since you have to explain your project to everyone and you don’t ask for any funding. It is also the fairest model, to begin with, because the project has to be financed by the team itself.

What Is TELLOR (TRB)?

Tellor is a hybrid solution between Strike and PoW, It is a method that has proven its effectiveness in resisting attacks (Sybil attacks) and ensuring network life. https://request-global.czilladx.com/serve/view.php?w=300&h=250&z=325fe079eb73cc7840&c=72960993f87b539853&n=e5a3a05335eb1820fbd6ad31ba55d80c01f0b2ffb7379e7358b5faa4deec4a4d&integrity=eyJrZXkiOiJkZGM2MzFjNDY5ZGE0YzNkMWYxYWM0NGVmYmI1NDU2MGJmN2Y0MGFmMTk0MDAzNjEwMjdhMDkxMjFlZmU1ZmNhIiwidGltZXN0YW1wIjoxNjI3MDc5NjA2LjIzNTYwMSwiaWRlbnRpZmllciI6IjRkNTc0MmJlYmNhN2ZmN2FjMzYwODg4MmViMjE3ODZhNTdjYTQ1Y2E2Nzg2ZWNhMWFiYjYyYjFjZjYxMjQzMGMifQ

Tellor, like Chainlink, is a decentralized Oracle on Ethereum where Proof-of-Work (PoW) is used. Nodes compete with each other to retrieve data and place it on the blockchain.

Oracle makes it possible to send information/data from the real world (also called off-chain data) to smart contracts. For example, it is possible to check whether certain conditions of a smart contract have been met using data from the outside world.

See the video explaining what is Tellor:



Let’s say there’s a smart contract that ensures you get you aero plane ticket. This smart contract makes it possible that you automatically and without human intervention get your money back (without having to make a claim) if your flight is delayed or canceled.

At this point, Oracle will do its job. It retrieves data from airports (if the flight was delayed) or weather stations (if the flight was canceled due to a storm). The Oracle will then forward the information to the smart contract, after which you will be refunded.

Problems Solved By Tellor

Tellor wants to solve price problems for the Defi applications. The team is working to provide more secure and transparent data to the Defi world. Oracle is also a database for miners competing against each other.

The TRB token (Tellor’s token) was created to send information to Oracle. It is also the basis for the rewarding miner. Each time a request is made, the Oracle ensures that the best search can be performed by the miner every 10 minutes.

Another problem with Defi is reliability. As in the above example, it could happen that someone is supplying incorrect information. As an application, you have to assume that the data provided is correct. Checking the data is also one of the problems.

Tellor Oracle is an on-chain database where miners compete to add data points. To create a suitable incentive system, Tellor uses the TRB token. The parties pay TRB to send the data request to Oracle.

Based on the reward awarded per request, Oracle chooses the best-Sponsored query every 10 minutes to create a challenge for miners and thus to solve. Each query collects specific data (e.g., BTC/USD price) and transmits it to the chain.

How Does Tellor Work?

First, the user will send a query to Tellor with TRB to encourage miners to choose this query over other queries. It’s a sort of auction. There may be other users who want the same data. They pay or tip for that dataset to encourage the miners even more.

Every 5 minutes, tellor’s smart contract selects the best-funded searches and offers a new challenge for miners. Miners send their PoW solution and off-chain data points to the Tellor contract. The Tellor contract sorts the solutions when they appear, and once they have received 5 Solutions, the official solution (the average of 5 Solutions) is chosen and stored on the blockchain. Miners will then receive their payout.

Of course, it can also happen that someone provides false information. The network can vote on that. The day after the vote, the condemned can challenge the result by paying a high fee. If it eventually turn out that the supplied data was wrong, the miner loses the case? If it turns out the miner was right, he will receive an additional reward.

how tellor-TRB works

Tellor Technology

The Oracle can ask miners for new data every 10 minutes. The miners then send the data. An average of five miners data is made, and the miners share the reward of the request. Miners are encouraged to provide reliable data in two ways:

  • They earn TRB tokens for every search that is processed.
  • They must store a certain number of TRB tokens to be eligible to resolve queries.

If the miner’s data is not validated or incorrect, he will be punished, and the network will take the number of TRB tokens he possess. Tellor has opted for a hybrid system that makes it possible to both reward and punish an unreliable miner.

The number of TRB tokens required to qualify for Tellor PoW is 1000 TRB tokens. That is a significant amount of money that miners cannot afford to lose by adding false information to the blockchain.

Especially since the Oracle doesn’t use one source to validate data, and anyone can challenge a miner. So miners are proactive to avoid any conflicts.

Any holder (owner of tokens) can challenge data added to the Oracle and, in return, earn TRBS if a consensus is reached between holders, voting for the correction of the data in favor of challenger.

Tellor Security

Tellor use security model where it would cost 1000 TRB per block to hack the Tellor network. That a lot of amount to attack the network. The more data confirmations, the more reliable the data is. Since anyone can challenge submitted data and be rewarded if it is confirmed, it is unlikely that false data will remain unaffected for a long time. This defensive model is similar Bitcoin blockchain, where the costs required to carry out a double-spending attack are very high. And the attack is not of any worth if it is not profitable.

Tellor vs Chainlink

Many people think that Chainlink and Tellor are very similar. That makes sense because both blockchain projects are working with quite the same goal. Both projects ensure that off-chain data can be delivered to the blockchain.

ChainLink currently has more confidence in Defi than any other project. LINK has only a few nodes identified and given permission to publish data to Oracle, especially because nodes are very expensive since you need to have a lot of LINK in your node to publish data.

The Tellor team is focused on decentralization. Anyone with 1,000 TRBS can set up a node and offer data to Oracle. Miners are anonymous and compete to provide the requested data.

Tellor also has a feature that allows token holders to challenge the data. If the challenge is legitimate, the challenger will be rewarded. This is a trait that Chainlink does not have.

See below a video explaining the difference between Chainlink and Tellor.



The TRB-token

Tellor’s token is called the TRB token. This token is extremely important, as it performs various functions. Many believe that the token is the most important thing for Tellor Oracle. Therefore, it is crucial to know what the token does and what it can be used for.

What can TRB be used for?

Payment: Users use TRB to retrieve the specific data they need. When miners submit data on the blockchain, they are paid with the TRB tokens as a reward.

Reward:  When miners add data to the Tellor system, TRB is given as a reward for miners. The Tellor team gets 10% of the mining reward.

Compete: The miner must send 1,000 TRB to the Tellor network to participate in the mining process. This is a way to avoid dangerous situations with the network.

Dispute compensation: TRB is used to resolve disputes about the validity of data. Both opponents and supporters will vote on the validity of the data.

Tokens Adoption

Here’s how Tellor thinks TRB token adoption will go:

  • Always Retrieve reliable data.
  • Increase in the value of the token price.
  • Increased rewards for miners.
  • Increased demand for tokens, as miners want to bet for rewards.
  • Higher security of the Oracle.
  • Increased approval.

This upward spiral decreases the profitability (incentive) of providing partial data to Oracle, as cheaters are punished. 

Tellor didn’t had any ICO or fundraising. The TRB tokens are therefore only issued through mining. Tellor’s total supply is determined by its use and extraction rates. For maximum supply, tellor’s coins increase with the percentage of remuneration * 144 requests per day.

Where To Buy TRB?

It is possible to buy TRB tokens on significant exchanges and also on many small exchanges. You can find TRB tokens on Binance, VCC, OKex, Huobi Global, Bibox, Bithumb, Gate.io, Poloniex, and Coinmerce. 

In the beginning, few exchanges supported TRB. But there was an explosion in the price of TRB, as more and more exchanges started offering TRB. As more trading venues support TRB, there is more liquidity. This is healthy for maintaining future price growth. 

Tellor Wallet

TRB tokens can be stored in almost any wallet that supports ERC20 tokens, as TRB is an ERC-20 token. 

The popular ERC20 wallets are Trust Wallet, Metamask, Ledger Nano S, Trezor, MyEtherWallet, Atomic Wallet, Coinomi, Enjin Wallet. You can store your TRB coins in any ERC20 compatible wallet but always make sure that to store your coins in a trusted wallet.

You can also store TRB coins on exchanges that provide top security like Binance, but it is not recommended to keep crypto on exchanges.

TRB Price Prediction

TRB was launched in Oct 2019. The launching price was 0.010 USD. No one would have thought that the TRB price would reach an All-Time High of $87.63 in Aug 2020. That is insane for profit for early TRB holders in matter of months. That is why crypto is famous for such high yields. But always remember that crypto can give you losses in the same way.

Our TRB price prediction for 2021 is $45 to $80.

TRB price prediction for 2022 is $75 to $200.

TRB price prediction for 2025 is $500 to $1000.

Please remember that these are speculations, and no one can guess what will be the future for any crypto coin. Please do your research before investing in any cryptocurrency.

By Ammara

Published
Categorized as Hot Crypto

Uniswap交易所的收割套路

无注册、无KYC、随进随出……只要一个ETH钱包,Uniswap赌场游戏即可开始。

10倍、100倍、1000倍、-50%、-90%、归零……在这个赌场游戏里,ETH是就是筹码,在Uniswap这个赌场里,暴富或归零,一面天堂,一面地狱,尽在其中。

完全公平、绝对透明,Uniswap没有发行代币,也不收上币费,被投韭菜们称为“币圈最公平,最透明内盘交易所”。

Uniswap上锁定的流动性已超过 1.65 亿美金。

信奉哈耶克自由市场论、中本聪去中心化价值观的币圈簇拥们,正在亲手打造的乌托邦里上演最原始的蛮荒故事。

Uniswap究竟是什么?

这是一个成立于 2018年底的基于以太坊的去中心化底层交易协议,说直白点,这是一个部署在以太坊网络的去中心化交易所。

2020年 7 月份,Uniswap的交易量和用户量开始激增。

币圈“大赌场”Uniswap的残忍程度超乎你的想象!图

不到一个月的时间,Uniswap就达到蛮荒鼎盛时期。

想要暴富只需要不断喊单,让人接盘即可。

币圈“大赌场”Uniswap的残忍程度超乎你的想象!图(1)

Uniswap上一个新项目的生命周期,从上线到散场,可能也就短短几天就结束了。就目前Uniswap APP内有3390个智能合约,也就是3390个代币。

“要么暴富,要么归零。”诸如此类的口号充斥在Uniwap 的聊天群里。韭菜们仿佛像极了2017年牛市时候的场景,各个杀红了眼,一窝蜂的冲进Uniswap的赌场。

Uniswap采用自动做市商机制,数学模型为X*Y=K。X是ERC20代币的数量,Y是ETH数量,K是常数。X 和 Y 是此消彼长的关系,有人在该合约中购买 ETH,那 X 的数量就会增加。

这个定价机制决定了,哪一边买入的数量多,币的价格就会上升,每天分的币就多,且暴力回本,甚至翻几倍都不等。

Uniswap上的 2 种投资方式,一是用ETH兑换项目代币,等待上涨,二是抵押资产加入Uniswap资金池,成为流动性提供者,赚取交易手续费分红。

币圈“大赌场”Uniswap的残忍程度超乎你的想象!图(2)

“冒险者的天堂,韭菜的炼狱。

新型去中心化传销

与动辄百倍、千倍的涨幅比起来,Uniswap上的交易量并不高,可怜的也只是有几万美元而已

,买的人越多收益越大,没有项目方没有上币费,全靠韭菜的力量,社群与社群之间的阶级斗争,比谁入场早,谁跑的快。然后一个轮回接着一个轮回的继续下去,就像炼狱的恶魔互相厮杀的场景。

几个小时就可以玩一把,甚至快到,你刚投入的以太坊,可能都不用一个小时就翻倍了,甚至几倍,有人说,一小时内见效,如果没涨,基本就算输掉了。想解套直接去社群里面呐喊,其他韭菜来入局。

其中某个社区,建群第一天就满员了,随后推荐一个叫SXY的项目最高上涨700倍,但截止写稿时,SXY价格距离高点已经腰斩,24小时交易量大跌92%,同比之前的喊单模式。韭菜还有喘息和逃跑的机会,而在Uniswap里面,炼狱大门只要进去就听天由命了,根本没有出去的机会。

币圈“大赌场”Uniswap的残忍程度超乎你的想象!图(3)

DeFi领衔的去中心化浪潮之下,币圈格局已经悄然发生转变,

在中心化的加密世界,交易所是绝对的王者。但是目前,依然改变和发生。

数字货币交易所除了找项目方收上币费、找投资者收手续费之外,还有内部暗箱操作的利润空间,比如低买高卖“卖假币”、插针爆仓、吃客损等。

DeFi或者Uniswap出现后,币圈的治理权已悄然转移。无论发币、上所、流动性交易,都正在被颠覆。

8月份Uniswap过去24小时交易额为 1.26 亿美元,这个数据已相当于 Coinbase交易量的三分之一。

以往靠上币费和手续费挣得盆满钵满,交易所们躺赚的时代已经是过去式。

以前是项目方求着上币,项目会选择先上去中心化交易所,当受众足够,就演变成了无需在去妥协,割韭菜的镰刀就会选择最廉价的产品。

中心化交易所会因此没落吗?小编看来,去中心化交易所如今更多是对小交易所产生冲击,大型的中心化交易所仍具有巨大的优势。这一乱象也表明,去中心化交易所同样存在着致命的缺点。

而这次DeFi 所带来的去中心化精神复兴。混乱蛮荒的投机故事之后,是币圈最后一滴价值被榨干,还是牛市的回归?这里给大家一个疑问。

与此同时,一个更直接更急迫的问题是,Uniswap还能火多久?热潮还能持续多久?

最近一周内,Uniswap的热度已经开始直线下滑,最明显的是用户数、交易量、转账数都在下滑。

币圈“大赌场”Uniswap的残忍程度超乎你的想象!图(4)

由于上币简单、缺少审核,Uniswap上的假币骗局俯拾皆是,几乎只要你手里有点以太坊,就可以自己发币,基本没有门槛,这位币圈的团队长提供很便利的割韭菜机会,以前还需要花钱找交易所,给上币费用,又要运维费用,白皮书等等一系列花销,从Uniswap出现以后,几乎是帮助了这些镰刀省去了很大一比开销不说,还给了他们更多的机会去收割韭菜。

据不完全的统计,在区区两天里,就有95%的新币项目都已弃盘跑路。

币圈“大赌场”Uniswap的残忍程度超乎你的想象!图(5)

DAPP内95%的项目已经跑路

币圈“大赌场”Uniswap的残忍程度超乎你的想象!图(6)

(韭菜被割后)

Uniswap是不是要结束了?

小编认为只要资金的流动性和人性的贪婪还在,Uniswap内的赌桌游戏就没有停止,但是这几天,主流币也纷纷涨了起来,不知道是为了把韭菜重新吸引回来,还是什么原因,这便导致了Uniswap热度也肃然下降,至少目前为止Uniswap内,聪明的韭菜已经离场。

说到底到底。谁才是最终的收益者?并且躺赚呢?

要知道,在这种战火蔓延的情况下,韭菜为了快进快出,可是把钱包转进转出的矿工手续费拉倒最快,也就是最高的GAS值。

所以,这bo 矿工发财了。

币圈“大赌场”Uniswap的残忍程度超乎你的想象!图(7)

而此时,Uniswap的残杀还在继续进行着,Uniswap是方便了别有用心的操盘手,将群内收割变成了,最快速且最合法的手段,这也是为什么Uniswap能火的最大的原因之一了,因为只有最新型的手段,才能韭菜愿赌服输,殊不知这背后,镰刀手从来都是悄悄地,悄悄的走,所以说,DEFi这波你跑了吗?还是继续厮杀?

By 壹米财经

币安400万资产用户资产遭冻结

币安不是在被维权,就是在被维权的路上。在国外被多个国家警告,在国内遭大量投资者维权,到底是有人在故意抹黑币安,还是却有其事?

币安的维权事件可不是一件两件,熊大先带大家回顾一下币安前段时间来遭维权的事件:1,币安穿仓事件,受害者倒欠币安钱。2,私吞国外用户107个比特币事件。3,收购swipe事件。4,陈*星维权事件。5,币安员工爆料公司内部混乱事件。6,币安智能链多个项目跑路事件。7,cover用户报团维权事件。8,2100万比特币数据压盘事件。9,合约市场拔网线恶意爆仓事件

最近,大家也注意到了,多个国家对币安接连出手,其中包括泰国、新加坡、日本、英国、开曼群岛等。前天,香港也即将发布对币安的警告,称没有任何实体注册但在其开展交易活动。


就如何一所说,币安采取的是全球分布式办公,不就可以我行我素,完全不顾及他国法律,只要你查我,我就说不在你国家办公?可能他自己都不知道受哪国家监管,又如何来保障用户资产。

最近,有位币安受害者反映,自己在币安被莫名冻结的400万资产,至今还没有解冻,当询问币安时,币安自己单方面说是执法冻结,再问是哪个国家,具体原因,执法文件,jc联系方式,冻结期限时,币安工作人员便支支吾吾,无法回答,然后就再也不理会用户。就这样一直拖着,至今已有大半年。

%title图%num%title图%num
触发风控,封禁账户无外乎就是涉及到了洗钱,如果说该用户从其他地方转U过来,变现,有可能U来路不正?如果是自己法币充值,那钱可能来路不正?来路正不正也不能仅凭交易所一句话,最起码拿出证据,比如配合某部门调查。但是币安又不隶属于任何国家,那么他配合谁调查还是说故意为之,之前国外107个比特币事件不就是币安故意为之的吗?

据受害者称:账户资金是自己准备买房的资金,以及从朋友那里借来的资金。如果真如受害者所说,币安确实要有个说法给受害者,即使不是受害者所说,那也要有个合理的解释。

维权不断,必有原因。分布式办公,维权难度可想而知,对于受害者来说,要不就想办法与平台沟通,要不就在网络中扩大影响力给币安压力。

%title图%num

在币圈,交易所没有监管,交易所就可以轻易地操纵币价。一些躲在海外的交易所风险更大,在这个圈子玩,你一定做好心理准备,人为操纵市场,跑路,破产随时都存在,如果你承受不风险了千万不要去碰。毕竟交易所经常干的就是私吞用户资产、插针、拔网线。

By 壹米财经

主流加密货币杠杆产品比较

在现货交易市场,我们习惯了追涨杀跌,赚币价上涨的时刻。但同样,我们也能过通过预判币价的下跌行情赚钱,这就是做空。我们知道,在熊市,做空是更容易赚钱的方式。

多空机制往往跟合约、杠杆挂钩,但是合约操作复杂,杠杆倍数高至100,劝退了不少投资者,因此,很多市场上的机会都被白白错过了。那么现货杠杆就是一个很好的风险替代品,相比合约数十倍甚至100倍的杠杆,现货杠杆倍数最高为10倍,多为3、5倍,风险更小,预留的应对时间更加充分,门槛也更低。

不必把杠杆当作洪水猛兽,以小搏大放大收益的杠杆,对于进取型投资者来说,至少增加了盈利的机会;而对于稳健型投资者来说,只要安排好持仓比例,就可以灵活控制风险。

但是风险还是存在的,在风险被成倍放大的杠杆市场,投资者除了合理配置仓位与风险之外,如何在参差不齐的衍生品市场中,找准更加安全便捷、性价比更高的交易平台?

本文将聚焦于杠杆市场中的现货杠杆(目前杠杆分为现货杠杆与合约杠杆),选取了国内6家主要的杠杆交易所,从现货杠杆的各个因素来进行对比,以供读者对比帮助使用杠杆这把双刃剑。

一、现货杠杆与期货杠杆

杠杆顾名思义,本质是以小博大,放大收益。

目前,在加密货币市场中,杠杆分为现货杠杆与合约杠杆。本篇主要聚焦的现货杠杆主要通过抵押借贷来扩大本金,强调以实际的数字货币作为支持,相比期货杠杆可以共享交易所现有的交易深度,其实是更适合现货交易所直接开设的功能。此外,由于现货杠杆的倍数更低,所以数字资产投资的新手在做期货合约之前,也可以选择现货杠杆试一试。

另外,借贷杠杆其实还有一个隐藏玩法,也就是说如果你对手上的加密货币充满信心,在资金短缺时不愿意卖掉手中的加密货币,那么你也可以选择抵押换取稳定币,解决手上流动资金的问题。在目前的借贷市场中,中心化加密货币借贷利率收取高达10%~20%的利率,而去中心化加密货币借贷则达到了150%以上的抵押门槛。两者相比交易所的现货杠杆而言,成本显然是更高的。

那么怎么做现货杠杆呢?举个例子。

假设目前BTC价格为6000USDT/枚。如果交易员A手里有1个BTC,想要做现货杠杆,他首先需要将这枚BTC存入杠杆账户充当保证金。

如果A认为BTC接下来有上涨的可能,那么他可以选择开多并选择3倍杠杆(意味着最多借保证金的 2 倍),这意味着他可向交易平台借来12000 USDT(6000*2) 买入 BTC,这时A账户有了3枚比特币。

如果BTC价格上涨至7000USDT/枚,A选择卖出2枚BTC获得14000USDT,去掉向交易平台借的12000USDT以及贷款利息(比如10USDT),A可在这次杠杆交易中赚取1990USDT,几乎是一枚卖出收益的2倍。

反之,如果A认为BTC接下来会跌,那么他可以选择开空,向交易所借来BTC并卖出,待到BTC下跌时再买回来还给交易所。 

当然,风险与收益共存,如果A预估错误,那么A将以亏损收场,如果亏损超过爆仓线,那么就会被强制平仓,所以要设置止盈和止损,并且要及时补充保证金,防止爆仓。

在这个案例中,我们可以看到,在现货杠杆的场景里,共出现了保证金(1个BTC)、杠杆倍数(3倍)、借币利息(10USDT)、爆仓线这些概念。

  • 保证金

保证金就是交易员手上可用的抵押金。一般来说,借入资金都需要用其它资产作为抵押,而且使用完之后还必须支付利息。在杠杆中,包括初始保证金与最低保证金。初始保证金是指在杠杆交易中,交易者开仓需要缴纳的保证金金额,在一些交易所里,杠杆账户净资产需要大于初始保证金,才能新开杠杆;最低保证金则是交易者保留仓位,不被强制平仓所需的最低保证金金额。

  • 杠杆倍数

杠杆倍数意为通过借贷放大的本金比例,现货杠杆有着比合约杠杆更低的倍数,区间在0-10倍之间,部分交易所则为3倍(合约则通常为1-100x), 杠杆越大,波动性越敏感。对于过高的现货杠杆,部分交易所会对投资者有一定要求,比如持仓数量、保证金比率。

  • 借币利率

现货杠杆中存在的借贷利息、交易手续费,是交易所利润的来源,也是投资者需要注意的重要因素。选择价格低廉的交易平台至关重要。

  • 风险率

风险率是评估杠杆账户爆仓风险的指标,表示账户总资产与借入资产的比例。风险率值越高,表示借入资产比例越低,账户越不容易爆仓。通常为资产/负债*100%的等式,也就是(本金+借到的资金)/(借到的资金+未还利息)*100%。交易所通常将根据风险率设置两条线,包括预警线,提示交易员及时追加保证金,提高风险率;以及爆仓线,当风险率低至爆仓线,平台将执行强制平仓操作。

二、各个平台对比

如何选择最适合自己的杠杆交易所,我们选取了5家交易所,包括三大头部交易所火币, OKEx, 币安,两家杠杆产品比较早开始做,并有所口碑的交易所:BitMax, Gate

1、币种种类

BitMax、Gate这两家可提供的杠杆币种数量更多一些,提供杠杆币种包括不少新兴公链、社区币在内;三大则以主流币为主。

不过值得注意的是,有些支持杠杆的交易平台并不支持自家平台币开杠杆,比如火币与OKEx干脆选择不支持自家平台币杠杆,目前在平台币的杠杆交易上,币安提供BNB杠杆交易,Gate提供GT杠杆交易;BitMax目前是支持最多平台币杠杆交易的一家交易所,包括BTMX、BNB、HT、OKB、FTT、KCS,也是行业首家率先支持自家平台币开杠杆的交易平台。

2、杠杆倍数

以上五家交易所中,提供5倍以上现货杠杆的交易所仅有OKEx、BitMax和Gate。各交易所对于杠杆倍数的区分依据不同,一种是依据用户负债(借入资产)或者本金决定,以OKEx、币安、BitMax为代表,前两者借入资产越大,可供提供的杠杆越小;BitMax则依据账户净资产判断杠杆能力,本金越多,可开杠杆也越高,本质是同一个道理。另一种是依靠币种性质(主流币/山寨币)决定,以Gate为代表,主流币可用杠杆更高;两者区分方式并不冲突,比如BitMax,既根据账户净资产也根据币种性质决定杠杆倍数。

当然对于交易员来说,采用杠杆区间更大的交易所显然更便捷。

虽然目前有声音认为高杠杆带来高风险,但纯从数字理解杠杆会给人误解,更重要的其实是一个交易员动用了多少风险资本,而这些资本在他的整个投资组合中占到了多大比重,更低的杠杆率并不一定意味着风险更低。

举个例子,想想一个 1000 美元的投资组合中的这两种情形:

(1)使用 100 美元的保证金存款做了 5 倍看涨杠杆 = 整个交易规模就是 500 美元。在这里,投资组合中的 10% 承担了风险。

(2)使用 500 美元的保证金存款做了 2 倍看涨杠杆 = 整个交易规模就是 1000 美元。这里虽然杠杆率更低,却有 50% 的资金在承担风险。

是否使用杠杆以及做多少倍杠杆,实际上取决于诸多因素——你如何判断风险、你的时间周期、你需要投入的资本数量,等等。

3、借币利率(日化)

在借币利率上,各家交易所对每个币种利率的设定并不相同,在此选取了BTC与USDT这两种使用频率比较高的主流币进行对比。

综合来看,币安、BitMax在借币利率上处于良心档位;不过,BitMax有一个规则比较适合短线交易者薅羊毛,不同于其他交易所(日利息按小时计算),杠杆交易借贷每8小时计算一次,在每天UTC时间0时、8时、16时进行利息结算,所以如果你在结算时间点没有借贷资产,就不会计息。

当然,一般用过交易所的都明白,对于利率来说,交易所一般都可以使用点卡和平台币换取折扣。在折扣上,交易所通常以平台币持币数量与近一个月交易总额来决定用户等级优惠,门槛更高,对于交易所小白来说不太友好,那么,点卡是更友好的存在,目前,点卡优惠前两名为BitMax(5折)、币安(75折)。

4、交易手续费

除了借贷的利息外,交易手续费利率也同样重要,由于杠杆放大了你的资金量,交易的手续费也会和杠杆倍数一样成倍增加。这个成本,也不容忽视。

在以上五所交易所里,交易费率处于低档位的有BitMax、币安、OKEx。不过,交易所的交易费率同样为阶梯费率,也根据用户过去30天交易量及平台币持仓量确定等级,等级越高者交易费越低。

5、仓位模式

先来厘清一下全仓跟逐仓的区别。

逐仓和全仓的主要区别是可用保证金种类不同,资金利用率不同,以及爆仓结果不同。在逐仓模式下,各仓位的保证金与盈亏单独核算,各仓位的风险与收益独立,如果一个仓位爆仓,不对杠杆账户中其他仓位产生影响。

全仓则意味着所有杠杆账户内的资产,都可以用作抵押品。且在借贷某个币种时,不需要有哪个币种也可以借贷。在这种全仓模式下,杠杆币种越多其实是更有优势的。

目前全仓的优势正在体现,火币是这样说的:“只要杠杆适中,经常被用于套期保值,而相比较而言,在波动率较高、杠杆较大的情况下,逐仓模式很容易被强制平仓”,这个理论值得商榷,但可以确定的是,全仓对于资金的使用效率显然是更高的。

早期采用全仓模式的是币安、OKEx与BitMax,火币在今年11月开通全仓模式,但支持币种较少。

5、风控率

风控主要体现在爆仓与预警线,作为杠杆投资者,第一要紧的是要了解平台如何决定爆仓的比率,每个平台对于爆仓线的公式或许都有差异。其中,火币、币安、OK、Gate公式虽有细微不同,但内核是类似的,总体来说都是账户总资产与借入资产的比例,风险率越高,表示借入资产比例越低,账户越不容易爆仓。BitMax的表述略微不同,以缓冲率替换风险率的说法,等于杠杆账户净资产/账户最低保证金。

附:五家平台风险率的计算公式:

1、火币:总资产(即本金+借币金额)/(借币金额+未还利息)*100%

2、OKEx:OKEx在今年6月用「保证金率」替换风险率,

保证金率=原“风险率”-1=(当前币对杠杆账户总资产-借币-利息)/借币*100%;当保证金率≤10%时,账户将触发强平以归还借贷资金;当保证金率≤20%时,账户将预警强平风险

3、币安:全部资产价值/(全部借款价值+全部应计利息价值)

4、BitMax:缓冲率 = 杠杆账户净资产/账户最低保证金,当缓冲率达到1.2时,用户会收到爆仓预警邮件;当缓冲率低于1时,平台可随时进行强制平仓

5、Gate:【(计价货币总资产-计价货币未还利息)/最新成交价+(交易货币总资产-交易货币未还利息)】/(计价货币总资产/最新成交价+交易货币借入资产)*100%

在此外,OKEx比较特殊的是,系统强行平仓偿还所有负债后,50%*用户剩余资产作为强平费将会注入杠杆交易风险准备金,用于分摊杠杆强平账户的穿仓损失。OKEx还会抽取每日杠杆可分配利息的15%作为平台收入注入杠杆交易风险准备金,用于杠杆交易的穿仓分摊。但是分摊这个制度一直存在争议,毕竟这代表本属于用户的盈利被平台拿去分摊穿仓损失了。目前,在以上交易所中,BitMax是0分摊的。

从以上的分析可以看出,杠杆交易上各有特色,但开放的时间与交易所的实力的确影响了杠杆交易产品的完成度。

币种丰富:BitMax、Gate

杠杆倍数:OKEx、BitMax、Gate

借币利率:币安、BitMax

交易手续费:OKEx、币安、BitMax

风控:币安、BitMax、Gate 

最后还是建议各位杠杆并非洪水猛兽,要冷静地观察市场,静待市场机会,刚开始可以小数量借币来尝试,待到业务熟念可以步步为营。当然,也要提醒各位的是,杠杆虽好,可不要贪杯哦。

By 链得得

Mogo Finance推出比特币返现抵押贷款

2021年3月,在美加两国上市的温哥华金融科技公司Mogo Finance推出了比特币返现抵押贷款计划,旨在向申请新抵押贷款或对现有贷款进行再融资的会员提供赚取现金的机会,以帮助他们通过比特币奖励账户购买该加密货币。

在周一发布的一份声明中,Mogo Finance表示,将扩大其现有的比特币返现奖励计划,将“MogoMortgage”也纳入其中。

在会员使用“MogoMortgage”进行新的抵押贷款或再融资后,用户最高可获得3100加元(2461美元)的返现奖励。奖励将以美元的形式分配到客户的账户中,从而允许客户通过Mogo应用程序中的MogoCrypto程序购买比特币。

17e274f6-5b57-4c85-a0b5-1c03c5cee857.png

Business insider撰文称,作为一家总部位于温哥华的金融科技公司,Mogo Finance是独一无二的,因为它是唯一一家允许客户直接投资比特币的抵押贷款、个人贷款和投资服务公司。因此,该公司此次发布的消息颇具重要性。

Mogo Finance创始人兼首席执行官David Feller表示,加拿大的住宅抵押贷款市场是一个巨大的市场,估计价值约1.7万亿美元,公司可以通过其服务为客户提供安全购买比特币的能力,帮助客户增加财富,从而获得市场份额。

“与传统的奖励计划不同,比特币奖励有一个独特的特点,那就是它是一种资产类别,可以随着时间的推移而升值——5年前投资于比特币的3100美元,今天价值将超过35万美元,”Feller写道。

为了缓解客户对直接投资比特币的担忧,Mogo Finance希望其抵押贷款奖励计划也能吸引更多对加密货币感到厌倦的新客户。

Feller指出,“鉴于比特币的波动性和投机性,越来越多的加拿大人正在寻找不让自己的资金承担风险的参与方式,我们的比特币奖励计划满足了这一需求。” 

Mogo Finance成立于2003年,并于2015年6月在多伦多证券交易所首次公开募股,市值超过5亿加元。去年12月,该公司宣布计划对比特币进行高达150万加元(合119万美元)的企业投资,并表示将在2021年考虑追加购买。今年2月,Mogo Finance宣布将收购加拿大加密货币交易所Coinsquare 19.99%的股份,并有权将其所有权增加到40%。

By 巴比特

币圈是全球最大的资金蓄水池

最近比特币之类的虚拟货币炒作之风受到了全世界主流政府的联手打击。中国方面是直接断开了虚拟货币与整个金融的兑换链接,将虚拟货币兑换成人民币构成刑事犯罪。在美国那边稍微缓和一点,它规定一万美元以上的虚拟货币交易都必须向美国国税局报备,私下交易构成洗钱和逃税等重大违规,将予以严惩。这事好玩就好玩在,中美两国已经很久没有任何共识了,没想到在打击炒币圈的问题上居然达成了一致。

好吧,整个炒币圈现在游离在全球正统金融体系之外,那些所谓的虚拟货币交易所都不知道算个啥玩意,交易和兑现规则都是几个数码狗瞎编的,也没有任何备用金或其它任何金融保障措施。但就是这种堪称是小孩过家家级的烂玩意,近三年来已经发展成了全球最大的资金蓄水池。根据比特币家园网站的数据统计,2018年全球比特币交易量2.21万亿美元,2019年暴增到6.11万亿美元,2020年继续暴增到11.67万亿美元。今年一季度又干到了6.13万亿美元,全年超过20万亿美元不是梦。20万亿美元是个什么概念呢?美国股市年成交量约50亿美元,中国股市年成交量约30亿美元。虚拟货币市场,这个连最基本的交易规则都是胡扯八道的玩意,居然已经成为美国上市股票和中国上市股票之外,全球第三大交易品种,把全球各大商品期货市场那小小的万把亿美元成交量,远远的抛在了后面。

而这一点,恰恰是非常非常有趣的事情。在这里,我必须详细阐述,资金蓄水池这个概念。各位,所谓资金蓄水池,就是将资金死死的圈在金融账户之内,让它无法流向实体经济。在这个角度上,股市和期货市场,都是蓄水池。在这个池子里的资金,是不会流出去买米买油买钢材的。那些在期货市场给螺纹钢下多单的货,他们也绝不愿意真的拿下这批钢材,他们也就是跟空头相互拿着钢价赌博罢了。资金在股票账户和期货账户之间流转,你输我赢,爆仓或者大赚,资金池越来越大,由此,就吸纳了社会上泛滥的现金,尽可能的抚平通胀的浪潮。实在是抚不平的,比如极度恶性通胀的委瑞内拉,其实股市指数近四年来也是五十倍五十倍的涨,好歹也起到了一点点资金蓄水池的作用。从这个角度来分析,房地产当然不是什么蓄水池。你买房花的每一分钱,都会变成土地款(然后被政府用于基础设施建设以及公务人员的福利待遇),变成钢筋水泥,变成地产公司的工资,变成银行的利息,总之,没有任何一毛钱会沉淀在金融账户里。恰恰相反,由于在整个资金循环过程中不停的放杠杆,你花的一分钱,经过循环以后轻轻松松就能变成一毛钱,放大十倍容易得很。所以,你越是买房,被各种信用杠杆创造出来的资金洪水就越大,就越想找地方发泄。而这,恰恰是全球走投无路的资金,最终归集到虚拟货币这种垃圾之上的原因。实在是没有其他的蓄水池了,唯有比特币这个粪坑可以稍微承载一下全球泛滥的资金洪流。

不过这还算不上好玩。好玩的是,2021年全球明明已经陷入通胀潮之中了,中美两国却开始不约而同的,要干掉虚拟货币这个最大的资金蓄水池。之前还没发作通胀的时候你不去填粪坑,现在通胀都发作出来了,你转头把粪坑给填了,满出来的资金潮你打算往哪里引?尤其是美国,你接下来还有足足五万亿美元的各种疯狂印钱计划,你到底打算咋办?搞美国版大基建可不是在建蓄水池,由于基建投资的每一毛钱都花在了实体上,没被封闭在金融账户内部,它恰恰会造成全行业资金泛滥,大宗商品价格暴涨。总之,这事实在是过于玄幻,我个人目前唯一的想法就是:时逢乱世,必生妖孽。啥奇奇怪怪的破事,我觉得在这两年,都能见识到。总之,每一天都能见证历史。所以,就让我们继续见证吧。

By 数据归集处

央行约谈支付宝,旨在切断炒币资金链

针对虚拟货币交易炒作,监管再放大招。根据央行官网6月21日消息,央行近日就银行和支付机构为虚拟货币交易炒作提供服务问题,约谈了部分银行和支付机构。不少机构也向北京商报记者进一步回应将坚决抵制虚拟货币交易,持续开展全面排查和打击治理。

约谈

根据央行官网6月21日消息,近日央行有关部门就银行和支付机构为虚拟货币交易炒作提供服务问题,约谈了工商银行、农业银行、建设银行、邮储银行、兴业银行和支付宝(中国)网络技术有限公司等部分银行和支付机构。

央行有关部门指出,虚拟货币交易炒作活动扰乱经济金融正常秩序,滋生非法跨境转移资产、洗钱等违法犯罪活动风险,严重侵害人民群众财产安全。各银行和支付机构必须严格落实《关于防范比特币风险的通知》《关于防范代币发行融资风险的公告》等监管规定,切实履行客户身份识别义务,不得为相关活动提供账户开立、登记、交易、清算、结算等产品或服务。各机构要全面排查识别虚拟货币交易所及场外交易商资金账户,及时切断交易资金支付链路。

此外,央行强调,机构要分析虚拟货币交易炒作活动的资金交易特征,加大技术投入,完善异常交易监控模型,切实提高监测识别能力;要完善内部工作机制,明确分工,压实责任,保障有关监测处置措施落实到位。

金融科技专家苏筱芮表示,央行约谈部分机构,全方位切断炒币资金支付链路,体现了监管方对于严禁虚拟货币交易的严格态度。在她看来,虚拟货币炒作投机风险极高,虚拟货币本身也存在脱离监管视线后的洗钱、恐怖融资等潜在风险,既不利于经济“脱虚向实”,也不利于维护金融稳定大局,随着央行数字人民币项目的不断推进,官方性质的数字货币发展路径日趋明朗,其他“代币”“虚拟币”等发展的空间将会愈发狭窄。

宏观分析师周茂华同样告诉北京商报记者,监管层明确禁止金融机构为虚拟货币相关交易提供账户等支持,打击比特币挖矿和交易行为等,明确了防范虚拟货币投机炒作风险的态度,并向市场警示其中风险,有助于为此前虚拟货币市场“狂热”炒作降温;同时,随着相关措施的实施,国内相关交易与挖矿市场将逐步萎缩,但也不排除部分交易、挖矿行为转移至境外。

回应

继央行发布约谈部分银行和支付机构消息后,多家机构紧急回应。6月21日下午,支付宝回应北京商报记者称,将持续开展对虚拟货币交易的全面排查和打击治理,包括加强支付交易环节风险监测,严禁虚拟货币转账交易;加强异常交易监测,对嫌疑付款方风险提醒、收款方进行限权。同时,还将加强商户管理,严禁虚拟货币商户准入等。

此外,工商银行、建设银行、农业银行、邮储银行、兴业银行也纷纷发布虚拟货币交易禁令,表示坚决不开展、不参与任何与虚拟货币相关的业务活动,禁止涉及虚拟货币交易客户准入,并将对客户及资金交易加大排查和监测力度。

在周茂华看来,虚拟货币剧烈波动与“造富神话”吸引众多投资者参与投机,但从虚拟货币表现看,以比特币为代表的虚拟货币的波动性是一般股票波动的数倍,不乏杠杆参与者财富“一夜被洗劫”;并且难以用传统的基本面、估值方法进行分析等,其更像是另类投机品,并不适合普通投资者。在他看来,监管层出台禁令,银行支付机构全面封杀虚拟货币交易,都是为了保护投资者切身利益,维护市场正常秩序等。

北京商报记者注意到,在多方的严打下,近段时间币价跌跌不休。根据非小号数据显示,截至6月21日18时53分,比特币价格报32530美元,日内跌幅达4.69%,近七日跌幅20.08%,近3个月下跌幅度达43.07%;此外,以太坊最新报价1966.56美元,日内跌幅6.61%,近七日跌幅23.89%,近30天下跌32.42%。

在周茂华看来,金融机构切实履行客户身份识别义务,并切断相关活动提供账户开立、登记、交易、清算、结算等产品或服务,相当于切断虚拟货币投机交易资金渠道,预计后续虚拟货币交易量还会急剧下降,没有资金支持后,虚拟货币价格预计还将继续下跌。

高压

事实上,无论是监管约谈还是机构打击,这一场关于虚拟货币的打击活动,实则与此前一脉相承。

早在2013年,监管就注意到了比特币的风险,并发布了名为《关于防范比特币风险的通知》;此后2017年,央行等多部门联合发布公告,定性代币发行融资为非法行为;近几年来,包括北京、上海、深圳等多地监管均在持续开展虚拟货币交易的摸排整治。

对于虚拟货币交易情况,此前便有一接近监管人士告诉北京商报记者,对于虚拟货币整顿仍然保持高压态势。不管公司主体设在国内还是国外,只要涉及到为国内消费者提供非法交易通道,就要被严惩。此外,不仅针对发币企业主体,为注册在境外的虚拟代币交易平台提供引流、服务以及资金通道的企业均要打击。

在苏筱芮看来,对于机构来说,要全面切断炒币资金,一方面在开户阶段需要强化认证流程,对于资料不齐全、可疑身份等情形拒绝开户;另一方面则需要在事中环节加大反洗钱监测,运用科技手段实施穿透式管理。

周茂华则认为,为维护法币地位、投资者利益和市场正常秩序,仍需加快补齐监管短板,监管部门和金融机构形成合力,提升监管效率;此外,也可通过加大宣传提高投资者防范虚拟货币投机炒作风险;同时,国内可深入跟踪研究虚拟货币技术方面的发展,加快法定数字货币的研发和推广。

By 岳品瑜 刘四红